FieldHerpForum

A community of field herpers.

* FAQ    * Search    * Memberlist
   * Profile    * Login     * Register


Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index -> The Forum
Author Message
 Post subject: Which Missouri Nerodia?
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:02 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
This snake was coiled in some branches above a lake in Perryville, southeastern Missouri. Not too far from Snake Road, as it happens.

I got a couple of photos from a distance, then it uncoiled quickly and nose-dived into the lake.

I'm not too familiar with Nerodia in general and am having a hard time identifying this guy from the imperfect photos. I included an extra-large image here in the hopes that would make any diagnostic features clearer. Any ideas?

Image

John


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:19 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4183
Location: Tallahassee Florida
Nerodia cyclopion.

Later, KW


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:55 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Posts: 2537
Location: Hays, KS
I can see the cyclopion in it, but it also looks like rhombifer. What diagnostic are you using to make that ID KW?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:54 pm
Posts: 549
Location: Hays, KS & Littleton, CO
I'm going to have to agree with Chad and say Nerodia rhombifer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 4:46 am 

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 554
Location: st. louis mo
From The Amphibians and Reptiles of Missouri by Tom R. Johnson

Re: Nerodia cyclopion
"Presumed to occur in the natural cypress swamps of extreme southeastern Missouri.
No specimens have been taken in Missouri since 1961."
Historic range map doesn't reach Perry county.

Respectfully.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 5:02 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4183
Location: Tallahassee Florida
Dorsal pattern resembles rhombifer more (but is still in the realm of cyclopion), but the head doesn't look to me for rhombifer and I see scales between the labials and eye, so that's what I'm calling it. Range is close enough that it wouldn't affect my choice.

Later, KW


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 5:06 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:02 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
Thanks for the replies. I did look for that extra row of scales between upper labials and eye, and couldn't decide whether I saw them in the photo or not. There is a pronounced crease/fold from the snout to the back of the head right about where those scales are/would be. I don't know if that's normal -- I haven't seen it on other water snakes that I've encountered.

John


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:35 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 7:41 am
Posts: 2824
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Let me start by disagreeing with KW, just on principle. :lol: Actually, this snake is much too boldly patterned to be cyclopion for me.

While it does have bit of a N. rhombifer look based on the pattern on the anterior end, the underside and posterior pattern lead me to Nerodia sipedon. Also, the head isn't "right" for rhombifer.

So my vote is N. sipedon pleuralis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:22 am 

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 3:53 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Jefferson City, MO
I agree with chrish. My first thought was sipedon. It is definately too patterned for any cyclopian I have seen, and doesn't look like a rhombifera either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:25 am 

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 116
It's Nerodia sipedon.

TV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:48 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Posts: 2537
Location: Hays, KS
I wasn't thinking sipedon at all and I'm still leaning towards rhombifer myself...BUT, the head structre isn't like that of rhombifer and the neck pattern screams sipedon...so in other words, no clue. :bigthumb:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:57 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:09 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Portland, OR
I have no clue, but I'm going with Terry.
Nate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 10:57 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Posts: 2537
Location: Hays, KS
Yeah, I'm going to switch my vote. I'll side with Bob Krager and Terry V...N. sipedon.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 11:35 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:02 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
Thanks for all the replies. I don't feel so bad about not being able to identify this snake anymore!

John


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 12:36 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:31 pm
Posts: 561
Location: New Mexico
Ribbit wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. I don't feel so bad about not being able to identify this snake anymore!

John



Well, it's more the quality of the photo you posted. Get a good shot from above and it'd be a lot easier.

That being said, I only ever found N.sipedon when living in MO, so I'd say that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:02 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
ErikNM wrote:
Ribbit wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. I don't feel so bad about not being able to identify this snake anymore!

John



Well, it's more the quality of the photo you posted. Get a good shot from above and it'd be a lot easier.


I do realize that with a good photo from the right angle it would not be so difficult. Probably even I could identify it in that case. But this was the only angle possible, and I was lucky to get even this lame photo before it dove into the water.

John


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:02 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:31 pm
Posts: 561
Location: New Mexico
No worries. In western NM I had found some narrowhead gartersnakes and just disregarded them as the same nasty, smelly, biting water snakes I found in MO (although I'm sure some would say they are just that).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:10 pm 

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 5:19 pm
Posts: 194
Location: central K
Definitely not sipedon. The head shape gives that away. I am going to agree that the head says cyclopion, but the rest says rhombifer. I would say I'm 90% sure it is rhombifer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 8:28 am
Posts: 1391
Location: Murphysboro, Illinois
I'd say it definitely IS sipedon. The pattern and belly look just like most N. sipedon pleuralis that I've ever seen. And the shape of the head is pretty typical of larger individuals.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:21 pm
Posts: 957
Location: Camp Wood, TX
Not cyclopion, the body pattern is vaguely remiscent of rhombifer, but the black vertical bars seem too wide and the head is wrong for that. Probably a sipeodon (but could be rhombifer)

Troy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 4:29 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:21 pm
Posts: 736
Location: St. Louis, MO
I'm going with sipedon. To me, it just looks like an old battle wounded snake with one of those odd shaped heads.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Posts: 2537
Location: Hays, KS
Using the venter as an indicator, I think it's a sipedon without a doubt.

This is the venter of a rhombifer:
Image

...and this is a sipedon:
Image

sipedon gets my vote.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4183
Location: Tallahassee Florida
http://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/experience ... _water.cfm

Venter's are too variable.

Later, KW


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:21 pm
Posts: 1042
Location: St. Louis / MO
I'm thinking sipedon too. My first thought was sipedon and I believe it to be correct. I also thought about diamond-backed water snake. However, it just doesn't look to me like a diamond-backed water snake.

Ryan


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 4:58 pm
Posts: 1373
Location: TX
Fun. Any habitat photos? Just by the head, I would say it is definitely not rhombifer.......I don't think I've met a rhombifer that didn't have upward projecting eyes. It does seem too boldly patterned to be an adult cyclopion, but cyclopion is a better guess than rhombifer IMO. Also, rhombifer and sipedon are more general habitat users than cyclopion......if that snake was found outside of a floodplain, I would rule out cyclopion. Probably sipedon.

Shane

edit: and upon review, I wonder why I overlooked what made it a definite sipedon in the first place?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:31 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:02 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
This is the closest I got to a habitat photo:

Image

For a teensy bit more context, here's the water snake photo without cropping:

Image

I didn't think to take a picture of the tree and lake after the snake took its plunge (I was too busy staring at the water to see if it would resurface, alas).

John


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 6:07 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 1308
Location: Tallahassee, FL
I consider myself a bit of a Nerodia connoisseur (:lol:) and that animal looks straight up sipedon to me.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:08 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:53 pm
Posts: 575
Location: Columbia, Missouri
It looks like a fairly standard sipedon to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index -> The Forum


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright © 2007 FieldHerpForum